Forum

Remote view of a Pa...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Remote view of a PanelView Plus 7 line HMI from home, IT refuses any port forward

8 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
75 Views
(@rookie_ray)
Trusted Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 38
Topic starter   [#170]

First year here and I'm still finding out what we've got, because almost none of it is written down. Management want to see the line 2 HMI from home, mostly production counts and alarms. It's a PanelView Plus 7 on a CompactLogix 5380, one unmanaged switch, and the plant network sits on its own range behind a firewall IT look after.

So I asked IT to forward the VNC port on the terminal and got a flat no, and no to 3389 to the engineering PC either, with nothing beyond "not happening". Someone on my shift said TeamViewer, so I tried the free one for an hour and IT saw it and blocked it the same day. They won't hear of anything coming in.

Is a port forward really that bad if its only a viewer? Or any ideas for a way of doing this that IT would actually say yes to, because I'd rather not go back with the same ask twice?


Advertisement

   
Quote
 suel
(@suel)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 19
 

Yes, it's that bad. A forwarded VNC port on a terminal is on Shodan inside a week, and the terminal has no lockout. IT were right and short with you, both.

What does the plant firewall allow outbound? Anything at all on 443?


Advertisement

   
ReplyQuote
(@rookie_ray)
Trusted Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 38
Topic starter  

Outbound 443 is open, that's how the engineering PC gets its updates. Nothing else that I know of. So if the box inside calls out that's allowed, and nothing calling in is. Might be something to work with there.



   
ReplyQuote
(@mira88)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 0
 

Outbound is the shape of the answer, and nothing inbound. A small VPN router on the machine network that dials out on 443 to a hosted service, eWON Cosy, Tosibox, Secomea, that class of box, and the people at home connect to the service with their own client and MFA. IT gets a device that only calls out, a user list and a session log, which usually turns a no into a yes.

Then decide what they can do. View only for management, the terminal's VNC in view mode, or a read only page of counts and alarms. Pressing buttons from a sofa needs a physical permissive on the machine, and I'd still argue against it.

There's a writeup on this here: https://plctr.com/remote-monitoring-and-control-of-plc-systems/



   
ReplyQuote
(@rookie_ray)
Trusted Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 38
Topic starter  

Took it to IT with the outbound only bit and the session log, and they said they'd look at it, which from them is a yes. Then they asked what the box was called. Which is the one question I couldn't answer.



   
ReplyQuote
 suel
(@suel)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 19
 

Any of the three she named, and I think you pick the one your distributor stocks. Ask for the MFA option and the audit log in writing. And the terminal's VNC stays view only.



   
ReplyQuote
(@rookie_ray)
Trusted Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 38
Topic starter  

Ordered a Cosy through the distributor. IT approved it once they saw it only talks outbound on 443 and the service has MFA and a session log. Set the terminal's VNC to view only with a password, management gets a viewer account each, no control.

So my guess in the first post was wrong. A port forward isn't fine even for a viewer, and what plants do is a box that only calls out, with MFA and a session log, view only at the far end. What got it approved was asking IT for that instead of asking for a port.

One thing I hadn't thought about, the counts management want are on a screen the operators change every shift, so from home they'll see whatever page is up.

Thanks mira88 and suel.



   
ReplyQuote
(@plctr_admin)
New Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 0
 

Getting IT on side first is the hard part. Nicely done.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: